Year 8 core - answers
Simple composite areas
- m. Method: .
- . Method: .
- cm. Method: .
- m. Method: rectangle m; triangle ; total .
- About cm. Method: rectangle cm; semicircle cm.
Perimeter
- . Method: the notch adds two -cm inward cuts and a new cm edge parallel to the top; original perimeter plus from the notch = . (Alternative walking-around count gives the same total.)
- m. Method: walk the L: .
- . Method: each corner removes a square but adds two new edges of length instead of one -edge; net change per corner. Original perimeter ; actually each cut increases the perimeter by . Wait - each corner cut replaces a corner with two -cm edges, so perimeter stays . Correct answer: .
Approximate by grid
- cm. Method: .
- cm. Method: each small square is cm; .
- Fewer partial squares, each contributing less error. As the grid gets finer the estimate approaches the true area.
Explain and spot the mistake
- Correct for the decomposition approach, but fails if the two rectangles overlap. Example: two rectangles that overlap by ; naive sum , actual area .
- The formula is only for a plain rectangle. A notch changes the outline; the perimeter can be the same, larger, or (rarely) smaller depending on the notch shape.
- Both have area - equal. ; . Wait: second is . So the plain rectangle is larger.
- Both equal m and m. Equal - the average of the parallel sides () equals the rectangle’s constant width.
Real contexts
- Grass area: m. Seed g kg.
- m approx. Method: slab m; semicircle ; .
- cm. Method: .
- ha. Method: area m; divide by .
Challenge - answers
Harder composites
- Area cm (rectangle + semicircle ). Perimeter cm.
- cm approx. Method: square ; circle ; .
- About cm. Method: … this is an approximation problem; any reasonable decomposition and arithmetic is fine.