Year 7 Science | Victorian Curriculum 2.0
Scientific investigation & inquiry skills
Topic 09 | Science inquiry | Practice

What you will learn

  • how to turn a vague curiosity into an investigable question and a testable hypothesis,
  • how to identify independent, dependent and controlled variables in an experiment,
  • how to plan a fair test, recognise risks, and choose suitable equipment,
  • how to represent data using tables, line graphs, bar graphs and scatter plots,
  • how to analyse results, identify anomalies, and write an evidence-based conclusion.
Why does this matter?

A claim is just an opinion until someone tests it carefully. Scientific inquiry is the shared set of rules — how to design a fair test, how to record data honestly, how to separate cause from coincidence — that turns hunches into knowledge everyone can check. These skills are not just for scientists; they are how you decide whether a headline, a product ad, or a friend’s advice is worth trusting.

Where you'll see this
  • News and health: “eating this food lowers cholesterol” — what was the sample size? was there a control group?
  • Consumer choices: battery-life comparisons, fuel-economy claims, phone-screen durability tests.
  • Environment: monitoring water quality in a creek involves identifying variables and anomalies.
  • School assessments: your science reports, EIAs, and experimental design tasks all use these steps.
  • Everyday problem-solving: “why is my plant dying?” is a science-inquiry question.
Worked example 0 Real-world example: does fertiliser make plants grow taller?

Question: How does the amount of fertiliser added to soil affect the height of bean plants after 4 weeks?

  1. Hypothesis: If more fertiliser is added, the plants will grow taller (up to a point), because plants use minerals from fertiliser to build tissue.
  2. Variables:
    • Independent (what I change): amount of fertiliser (0, 5, 10, 20 g per pot).
    • Dependent (what I measure): plant height in cm after 4 weeks.
    • Controlled (kept the same): same bean variety, same pot size, same soil, same light, same water, same start date.
  3. Method: 444 pots per fertiliser level (total 161616 pots). Measure weekly. Record carefully.
  4. Data: average height per treatment group — plot on a bar graph or line graph.
  5. Conclusion: if taller plants appeared with more fertiliser up to some level, and no taller with more, this supports the hypothesis within that range.

Key idea: a fair test changes one thing at a time while keeping everything else constant. This is what lets you say “the fertiliser caused the difference.”

1. Questions and hypotheses

A good investigable question is answerable by measurement. Examples:

  • Weak: “Are plants healthy?” (vague, no variables).
  • Better: “How does the amount of light affect the height of a sunflower?”

A hypothesis is a testable prediction that links a cause to an effect. A common structure:

If [I change X], then [Y will do Z], because [scientific reason].

2. Variables

  • Independent variable (IV): the one thing the experimenter deliberately changes. Usually drawn on the x-axis.
  • Dependent variable (DV): the measurement that may respond. Drawn on the y-axis.
  • Controlled variables (CVs): everything else that could affect the DV, kept the same.
Worked example 1 Identifying variables

Question: Does the type of drink bottle affect how long water stays cold in the sun?

  • IV: the type of bottle (stainless steel, plastic, glass).
  • DV: temperature of the water after 222 hours (°C).
  • CVs: starting water temperature, starting volume, position in the sun, time of measurement, room/outdoor conditions, thermometer used.

Key idea: every CV you miss is a possible alternative explanation that weakens your conclusion.

3. Planning a fair test

Key steps before you start:

  1. State the aim, IV, DV and CVs clearly.
  2. Plan multiple readings (replicates) so you can average and spot anomalies.
  3. Choose equipment that gives the right precision (a 303030 cm ruler for plant height, a digital thermometer to 0.10.10.1°C).
  4. Identify and manage risks: hot liquids, glassware, chemicals, electricity. State the safety measure.
  5. Check for ethics if using living things: no harm, appropriate numbers.

4. Recording data

A clear table has headings with units, independent variable on the left, and space for repeats.

Fertiliser (g)Height trial 1 (cm)Height trial 2 (cm)Height trial 3 (cm)Mean (cm)
012131212.3
518171918.0
1024232524.0
2022212021.0

5. Graphs

  • Line graph: when both variables are numerical and continuous (e.g. time vs temperature).
  • Bar graph: when the IV is a category (e.g. type of bottle, brand of battery).
  • Scatter plot: when you have pairs of measurements and want to see correlation.
  • Pie chart: for proportions of a whole.
051020Fertiliser added (g)0102030Plant height (cm)
Example line graph of plant height vs fertiliser added. Note the anomaly at 20 g.

6. Analysis and conclusion

An anomaly is a data point that does not fit the trend. Possible causes: measurement error, a disturbed specimen, a real effect (e.g. too much fertiliser is harmful). Report anomalies — do not silently drop them.

A conclusion links back to the hypothesis using the evidence.

Worked example 2 Writing a conclusion

Results: the data in the table above.

  1. “As fertiliser increased from 000 to 101010 g, mean plant height increased from 12.312.312.3 to 24.024.024.0 cm — roughly doubling.”
  2. “At 202020 g, mean height dropped to 21.021.021.0 cm — this is an anomaly relative to the trend.”
  3. “The results support the hypothesis up to 101010 g of fertiliser. Above this, extra fertiliser may damage the plants, so the hypothesis is only partly supported.”
  4. “Limitations: small sample, only one variety of bean, only 444 weeks — repeat with more plants over longer time.”

Key idea: conclusions state what the evidence shows, what it does not show, and what uncertainties remain.

7. Errors, limitations and evaluating

  • Random errors: small fluctuations (thermometer reading to nearest 0.5°C). Reduce by taking the mean of repeats.
  • Systematic errors: consistent bias (a misaligned scale). Reduce by calibrating equipment.
  • Limitations: things your design could not control (weather changing between test days).
Worked example 3 Spotting an unfair test

A student times how long different ice blocks take to melt. Block A sits in a warm kitchen; block B sits on a shaded bench outside.

  1. IV is supposed to be the ice block itself — but the location is also different.
  2. Temperature, light and air flow are not controlled.
  3. Any difference in melt time could be due to the location, not the block.

To fix: melt all blocks in the same environment, one at a time or side by side.

Correlation is not causation

Two things that change together are not necessarily cause and effect. Ice cream sales and drownings both rise in summer — the hot weather causes both, not each other. A good investigation controls other variables so only one cause remains.


Practice: Year 7

Fluency

Tier 1: recall and identify

    1. Define: investigable question, hypothesis, independent variable, dependent variable, controlled variable.
    2. Write a hypothesis for: “Does the height of a ramp affect how far a toy car rolls after leaving it?”
    3. In the experiment above, identify IV, DV and two CVs.
    4. State two reasons to repeat a measurement.
    5. Which type of graph should you use for: (a) temperature over time, (b) brand of battery vs total run time, (c) height vs weight of classmates?
    6. What is an anomaly?
    7. What is a risk assessment, and why is it needed?
    8. Name one random error and one systematic error in measuring liquid volume.
    9. What is a control group?
    10. State one reason why sample size matters.
Reasoning

Tier 2: explain and reason

    1. Explain the difference between an observation and an inference.
    2. Explain why controlling variables is essential for drawing cause-and-effect conclusions.
    3. Why is a hypothesis written before data is collected?
    4. A student presents only their three “best” data points. Explain why this is poor science.
    5. Explain why a larger sample size makes a conclusion more reliable.
    6. A friend says, “ice cream causes shark attacks, because both rise in summer.” Identify the logical error.
Problem solving

Tier 3: apply to a novel context

    1. Design a fair test to answer: “Does the colour of a drink bottle affect how quickly water inside heats in the sun?” State IV, DV, at least four CVs, and the number of replicates.
    2. A student records the following lengths of plant shoots (cm): 12,13,14,13,28,14,1212, 13, 14, 13, 28, 14, 1212,13,14,13,28,14,12. Identify the anomaly and suggest two possible causes.
    3. Sketch (in words, not on paper) the shape of a graph you would expect for water temperature over 20 minutes as an ice cube melts and then warms in a beaker. State what the y-axis and x-axis show.
    4. A class tests four brands of paper towel to see which absorbs most water. Describe a procedure with a clear IV, DV, three CVs and a replicate count.

Challenge

Reasoning

Harder reasoning

    1. A study finds that students who eat breakfast perform better on tests. Does this prove that eating breakfast causes better performance? Suggest two alternative explanations and describe how a better study could tell them apart.
    2. A class measures the boiling point of water on five different hotplates and gets readings of 999999, 101101101, 100100100, 100100100, 102102102°C. Which is most likely anomalous? Calculate the mean with and without it, and decide which is a better estimate of the true value.
    3. You want to know if a new fertiliser really works. Explain why you need a control group (no fertiliser) and why simply comparing “before” and “after” on the same plants is not enough.
    4. Design a simple investigation to test whether the length of a pendulum affects its swing period. State IV, DV, CVs, procedure, and what a graph of length vs period would look like.
Year 7 Science study companion | Practice